3,400 confidential and totally free groups to call and go to in the U.S...1,400 outside the U.S. . . . 98 of these in Canada.
Free, financial help given to women and families in need.More help given to women, families.
Helping with mortgage payments and more.More help.
The $1,950 need has been met!CPCs help women with groceries, clothing, cribs, "safe haven" places.
Help for those whose babies haveDown Syndrome and Other Birth Defects.
CALL 1-888-510-BABY or click on the picture on the left, if you gave birth or are about to and can't care for your baby, to give your baby to a worker at a nearby hospital (some states also include police stations or fire stations), NO QUESTIONS ASKED. YOU WON'T GET IN ANY TROUBLE or even have to tell your name; Safehaven people will help the baby be adopted and cared for.

Tuesday, October 25, 2016

Early Alfonzo Rachel Vid Examines Black Loyalty to Democrats

0 comment(s): (ANONYMOUS ok -but mind our rules, please)                                      << HOME

Monday, October 24, 2016

What Can Republicans Do For American Blacks? by Alfonzo Rachel

0 comment(s): (ANONYMOUS ok -but mind our rules, please)                                      << HOME

Sunday, October 23, 2016

"The Liberal Agenda Is Not The Black Agenda, Not The Family Agenda, Not The American Agenda"

0 comment(s): (ANONYMOUS ok -but mind our rules, please)                                      << HOME

Saturday, October 22, 2016

0 comment(s): (ANONYMOUS ok -but mind our rules, please)                                      << HOME

The Most Accurate Presidential Poll?

The IBD/TIPP poll — a collaboration between Investor's Business Daily (IBD) and TechnoMetrica Market Intelligence (TIPP)...considered the most accurate tracking poll in recent Presidential election history:


"After more than a week of blistering attacks from Democrats, celebrities and the press, Donald Trump has managed to pull ahead of Hillary Clinton by a 1.3 percentage point margin — 41.3% to 40% — in a four-way matchup, according to the new IBD/TIPP poll released today."


"Donald Trump held onto a 1-point, 41%-40% lead over Hillary Clinton as the IBD/TIPP presidential tracking poll showed little impact on either candidate after their third and final presidential debate Wednesday night. Libertarian Gary Johnson ticked up 1 point to 8%, while the Green Party's Jill Stein dropped a point to 4%...With a bit more than two weeks until the election, just under 12% of respondents said they still weren't sure which candidate they favored.
"...despite a media and political uproar over Trump's comments -- The New York Times' piece Thursday ran under the headline "Donald Trump Vs. American Democracy," while the Huffington Post's shouted "Trump's Shocking Answer On Respecting Election Results Is The Only Debate Moment That Matters" -- voters didn't appear to agree. The IBD/TIPP poll showed little if any erosion in Trump's support.
"One key fact that has shown up in the three days of IBD/TIPP polling is that Trump holds a substantial 42% to 31% advantage over Clinton among Independent voters. Independents, who in general tend to be socially liberal but fiscally conservative, now make up about 34% of the electorate, IBD/TIPP data show...Libertarian Party nominee Gary Johnson, who in the most recent poll garners 13% of the Independent vote, and Green Party nominee Jill Stein, who takes 5%, seem to have siphoned off more Independent support from Hillary than from Trump."

Charles Ortel, a highly regarded Wall Street financial expert, took a look at the Clinton Foundation's books over the last year or so and this week published his partial conclusion: "To informed analysts, the Clinton Foundation appears to be a rogue charity that has neither been organized nor operated lawfully from inception in October 1997 to date ... it is a case study in international charity fraud, of mammoth proportions."

Our polling shows Americans would definitely support such a move, either before or after the election. According to IBD/TIPP, nearly two-thirds (63%) think a special prosecutor should be look into both the family foundation and the emails [Clinton's repeated violations of the law and a shocking disregard for the minimal ethics requirements of government officials]. And 88% of Republicans and 68% of Independents want a special prosecutor to look into the possible misconduct. The sentiment that something wrong has taken place is overwhelming.

Perhaps more significantly, of the 72% who are following [the ups and downs of the Clinton Foundation], three-fourths — or 77% -- believe that donors to the Clinton Foundation received special access and favors from the State Department while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state from 2009 to 2013.

And there is, surprisingly, bipartisan agreement on this: Some 55% of Democrats agree that the Clintons used public office to dispense favors to their foundation's friends.

Or maybe you're rather read Rasmussen's poll after the third debate:
Friday, October 21, 2016

Early results from their final debate are in, and...the latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey of Likely U.S. Voters finds Trump with a 43% to 41% lead over his Democratic rival. Five percent (5%) favor Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson, while Green Party nominee Jill Stein earns three percent (3%) support.

Other interesting finds from that poll and other Rasmussen links there:
  1. "Mitt Romney earned 17% of the black vote in 2012, and Trump appears to be running near that level."
  2. "Voters now rate a candidate's business past as more important to their vote than experience in government."
  3. "A new high of 88% of voters now say they are certain how they will vote in this election. Among these voters, it’s Trump 48%, Clinton 47%, Johnson three percent (3%) and Stein two percent (2%)."
  4. Only "38% of Likely U.S. Voters believe serving as secretary of State is Clinton’s most important professional accomplishment." (that was the largest bloc; the next largest bloc was the 23% who are undecided about what is her most important accomplishment)
0 comment(s): (ANONYMOUS ok -but mind our rules, please)                                      << HOME

Friday, October 21, 2016

The Speech At The Al Smith Dinner That No One Ever Thought They'd Hear

Note how Hillary steadfastly does not applaud, nay, she doesn't even smile, when Trump gets applause for saying, "We can all agree on the need to stand up to anti-Catholic bias, to defend religious liberty and to create a culture that celebrates life". That's because she isn't about to agree to any of those things, and never has:

One thing I do applaud Trump for. Having stones. Romney and McCain were way too godawful safe. I'm glad someone is calling Hillary out, and to her face. It only took 30 years.

0 comment(s): (ANONYMOUS ok -but mind our rules, please)                                      << HOME

This Is The Media In Whom You Believe And Trust

SCARBOROUGH: Yeah but you know what? This is an example the media got something they can absolutely freak out about and claim that he is an agent of Vladimir Putin and destroying democracy in America. And it's just another example of the media having to find a little phrase and freak out.

"As a Republican, I have listened to Democrats talk about the only two times we won the White House in like 200 years that we stole both elections. I had to sit through Fahrenheit 9/11 and a lady was sobbing violently behind me about the election being stolen by George Bush and I patted her half way through and said, 'it's alright, it's alright. It's all a lie anyway.' Democrats have been whining for 16 years, they're still writing articles about how Bush stole the election in 2004 and 2000. So this holier-than-thou attitude that this is the first time anyone has suggested that the election is not a sacrosanct process. It is a joke! You guys bathe in that hypocrisy if you want to.

And bathe they will, till the acid-wash of it reduces them to bones with talking-skulls that you will still swear are telling you The Truth.

"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge." ~ Daniel J. Boorstin

"The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is." ~ Winston Churchill

But perhaps all my writing is in vain. "If you will not hear the truth, no one can tell you."

0 comment(s): (ANONYMOUS ok -but mind our rules, please)                                      << HOME

"Take The Money!"- Clinton Campaign Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri

From Yahoo!News, of all places. Oh, do go read it all.
0 comment(s): (ANONYMOUS ok -but mind our rules, please)                                      << HOME

"She created this mess and she knows it.”- Huma Abedin

Hillary Clinton solicited a $12 million donation from a government that her State Department considered corrupt, then realized the “mess” it would cause in her presidential run, a newly leaked email reveals.

King Mohammed VI of Morocco agreed to give the money to the Clinton Foundation, provided that it held a convention in his country in May 2015 with Clinton as the keynote speaker.

But Clinton realized that the conference, slated for a month after she announced her run for president, would hurt her candidacy.

“No matter what happens, she will be in Morocco hosting CGI [Clinton Global Initiative] on May 5-7, 2015. Her presence was a condition for the Moroccans to proceed so there is no going back on this,” top Clinton aide Huma Abedin wrote to campaign manager Robby Mook in a November 2014 email revealed by WikiLeaks.
“CGI also wasn’t pushing for a meeting in Morocco and it wasn’t their first choice. This was HRC’s idea, our office approached the Moroccans and they 100 percent believe they are doing this at her request. The King has personally committed approx $12 million both for the [foundation’s] endowment and to support the meeting,” Abedin continued.

“It will break a lot of china to back out now when we had so many opportunities to do it in the past few months. She created this mess and she knows it.”

The king gave the money to the Clinton Foundation and underwrote the CGI summit with the quid-pro-quo understanding that Hillary would attend, and other dignitaries attending were led to believe that she would be there.

But Hillary sent Bill and Chelsea Clinton while she campaigned in Nevada and California.

The deal with Morocco was struck even though the State Department — under Hillary Clinton — accused the country’s government of “arbitrary arrests and corruption,” according to Fox News.

Qatar, like most Muslim countries, treats women as second-class citizens, but champion-of-women Hillary never lets a little thing like that stop her from doing business. [“[Qatar] would like to see WJC [William Jefferson Clinton] ‘for five minutes’ in NYC, to present $1 million check that Qatar promised for WJC’s birthday in 2011.” — Ami Desai, director of foreign policy for the Clinton Foundation, wrote in a 2012 emai]

"And a far greater threat than murderous Muslims adhering to a fanatical 7th-century religious ideology lurks right here at home — those pesky Roman Catholics and their silly 2,000-year-old faith."

0 comment(s): (ANONYMOUS ok -but mind our rules, please)                                      << HOME

"Trump Is The Only Pro-Life Choice" -- Hands Down

Trump Is the Only Pro-Life Choice, Laura Ingraham, LifeZette

"No Fact-Checkers Can Cover For Hillary Clinton’s Ghastly Abortion Views", by Daniel Payne, senior contributor at The Federalist:

"Trump wasn’t commenting on what the Supreme Court has held; nor was he remarking on the frequency of late-term abortions, or the scope of abortion restrictions across the United States. He was commenting solely on Hillary Clinton’s position on abortion. The fact-checkers are checking “facts” that were never even addressed at the debate.
"Perhaps the most viciously mendacious quibble came from Dr. Jennifer Gunter, an OB/GYN who, writing at the Huffington Post, claimed late-term abortions are generally undertaken to kill a baby who has birth defects. As she put it, 'There are no ninth month abortions. Really. A ninth month abortion is a unicorn and so it’s ridiculous to even discuss it.'

"How does Gunter characterize this 'unicorn?' Simply put: '[T]erminations for birth defects isn’t ripping "the baby out of the womb in the ninth month." At 38 or 39 weeks, it’s always an induction and is simply called a delivery.' Got that? Killing an unborn human isn’t an 'abortion' if you don’t call it an abortion. Rather, it’s a 'delivery.' That makes it better.

"I have very little faith that Trump, if elected, would do much of anything about abortion. His own ostensible conversion to the pro-life movement feels insincere and opportunistic, like most of the rest of his campaign. But at the very least he spoke accurately about Hillary Clinton’s position on abortion. The least the fact-checkers and the journalist class could do is assess his claim honestly. But why would they start now?"

Ramesh Ponnoru, who referenced our blog's findings in his book, The Party of Death (p. 255, Chap. 3, Endnote #11, 4/2006), writes at The National Review in his article "Five Abortion Facts":
"Yes, Hillary Clinton is a late-term-abortion radical...

"...go back and read the transcript: What Trump said (in two iterations) was that 'if you go with what Hillary is saying in the ninth month you can take the baby and rip the baby out of the womb of the mother just prior to the birth of the baby.' That is the logic of her position on late-term abortion, which is that an abortionist should be free to perform an abortion at any stage of pregnancy if there is a health reason for it, including a reason of emotional health. Some journalists were touting this criticism of Trump’s comments and defense of Clinton’s position, which ends up saying that abortions at the very end of pregnancy never happen but should still be legal because of the principle of the thing. Trump grasps that logic and says he objects to it. 'Now you can say that that’s okay and Hillary can say that that’s okay, but it’s not okay with me.'”

Who in their right mind is it really ok with?

It's ok with Politico, the Los Angeles Times, Glenn Kessler at the Washington Post, the Huffington Post, the Guttmacher Institute (the "research arm" of Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion provider in the nation), NPR, the New York Times.

Let me ask how smart you all are: do you see the pattern in that last sentence?

What's the common thread in that sentence? Let me repeat the pertinent parts with emphasis this time:

Politico...the Los Angeles Times...the Washington Post...the Huffington Post...NPR...the New York Times...

Do you see the pattern now? Doesn't it make you stop and think: AM I really getting the straight skinny on the truth?

Or are all those news media outlets not telling me the real facts?

Don't you ever wonder? How can so many others so honestly be quoting such facts and such science, and be as wrong as you've thought them to be?

You are being duped, and you don't even know it.

0 comment(s): (ANONYMOUS ok -but mind our rules, please)                                      << HOME

0 comment(s): (ANONYMOUS ok -but mind our rules, please)                                      << HOME

Thursday, October 20, 2016

"Do As We Say, Republicans, Not As We Do"- Part 7

"Do As We Say..."

"Hillary Rebukes Trump for Encouraging ‘Hateful Rhetoric’" and "not denouncing false statements about POTUS"

"Trump's history of suggesting Obama is a Muslim" -

"Trump condemned for not correcting statement Obama is Muslim"

"...Not As We Do":

It was the Hillary 2008 campaign pushing the "Obama is a Muslim" fear-mongering narrative, to begin with: To Paul Begala [] and John Podesta [], on Tuesday, January 08, 2008, from Kristi Fuksa, of Hillary's polling advisory firm, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research:

Subject: RE: McCain Survey- Take 3

Paul et al- We've reworked the Obama message into the survey, as requested. But on the list of negative facts we need to cut ONE since we separated out gay adoption and his use of cocaine. Please send your suggestions. Thanks!
* 7 Obama (owe-BAHM-uh)'s father was a Muslim and Obama grew up among Muslims in the world's most populous Islamic country.

The lies just keep getting outed, folks. Question is, how will you ever know when she's lying to you, her loyal supporters?
0 comment(s): (ANONYMOUS ok -but mind our rules, please)                                      << HOME

"Do As We Say, Republicans, Not As We Do"- Part 6

"Do As We Say..."

Trump, The women, The Media Frenzy-to-do-anything-to-distract-you-from-Obama's-secret-wars-with-Russia-in-Syria-and-Iran-Iraq-you-name-it and the deficit and the national-debt-almost-doubled-from-$10-trillion-to-$18-trillion-thanks-to-Obama and everything else...

"...Not As We Do":

Joe Biden Touching Women, Young Girls, Creeping Everyone Out:

Once again, many thanks to my new favorite Hollywood hero, the inestimable and hammer-right-on-the-nail-head @RealJamesWoods.

0 comment(s): (ANONYMOUS ok -but mind our rules, please)                                      << HOME

"Do As We Say, Republicans, Not As We Do"- Part 5

"Do As We Say..."

"I know you live in your own reality, but that is [sic] not the facts."
And such fine grammar, at that.

"...Not As We Do":

"It worries me more that [Hillary] doesn’t seem to know what planet we are all living in at the moment." ~ Neera Tanden, "supposedly a close friend of Hillary and the head of the Center for American Progress, a left-wing think tank that is a branch of the Democratic Party", in an email to Hillary’s campaign manager, John Podesta, just over a year ago.
0 comment(s): (ANONYMOUS ok -but mind our rules, please)                                      << HOME

"Do As We Say, Republicans, Not As We Do"- Part 4

I don't think I'll be looking to anymore. The live-bloggers last night are so in the tank for Hillary, yet they make themselves appear so fair and unbiased and erudite, oh, my! It's too bad they just aren't, and here's just one example:
"Clinton and Trump both won their nominations, fairly and decisively."
Eh,...what? Are you not reading all the news? Are you really not getting the Podesta emails in your Twitter feed, proving the Democrats were so badly tipping the scales against Bernie and for Hillary to win the primary, that they had to fire Debbie Wasserman-Schultz to have anybody be the scapegoat for Hillary?

Now on to the post:

"Do As We Say..."

"It probably can’t be said enough that Trump repeatedly condoned violence toward protesters at his rallies."
Really? Really??

"...Not As We Do"

Democrats Pay Staffers To Incite Violence at Trump Rallies And Look Like Bernie Supporters...(thus oh-so-brilliantly trying to kill two birds with one stone)

Then Fire The Two Caught On Tape About It, But Claim They Weren't Fired, Just "Laid Off"

Go listen for yourselves to them brag about how to (keep) conduct(ing) voter fraud in favor of the Democrats.

And it gets better, folks. DYOR, don't wait for me. Or just check out the treasure trove of highlights here.

0 comment(s): (ANONYMOUS ok -but mind our rules, please)                                      << HOME

"Do As We Say, Republicans, Not As We Do"- Part 3

"8 Times Liberals Claimed An Election Was Stolen Or Rigged", by millennial Bre Payton at The Federalist.
0 comment(s): (ANONYMOUS ok -but mind our rules, please)                                      << HOME

"Do As We Say, Republicans, Not As We Do"- Part 2

From Powerlineblog's John Hinderaker:
Horrifying! Trump “upends a basic pillar of American democracy” by saying he will wait and see what happens on election day, because of his concern about voter fraud.

But wait! Who was the last candidate who refused to accept the result on election day, as certified by election authorities? Al Gore. Did Gore “upend a basic pillar of American democracy” when he tried to overturn the result of the 2000 election? I don’t remember the Associated Press saying so at the time. In fact, I would bet that the authors of this piece of AP hysteria were rooting for Gore, at the time. Unbelievable.

Know what else is a "a basic pillar of American democracy?" Anti-espionage laws broken, proven to be broken in the leaked emails, by Hillary Clinton and her portable memory-card, Huma Abedin.

Don't listen to me, go read the Wikileaked emails for yourselves. Read about how so many more of Hillary's lies have been proven to be exactly that.

0 comment(s): (ANONYMOUS ok -but mind our rules, please)                                      << HOME

Mary Landrieu Is A Democrat

Published on Sep 29, 2014:

"You are not Mary's cause and you are certainly not her charity. You are just a vote - nothing less, nothing more. You are just a means to an end, so that she remains in power."

Landrieu sought re-election in 2014. Former President Bill Clinton campaigned on her behalf in Louisiana. While Landrieu garnered 42% of the vote she fell short of the 50.1% required for re-election. She was defeated in the December 6, 2014 runoff election by her Republican opponent, Bill Cassidy.
"In August 2014, Landrieu announced that she had ordered an internal investigation into all of her flights during her time in the Senate after it was reported that Landrieu violated federal law by using taxpayer dollars to charter at least four private flights to campaign events.[68][69][70][71] In September 2014, Landrieu revealed that the internal investigation into her flights had concluded that she had improperly charged her Senate office $33,700 for private flights to campaign events since she had entered the Senate."

And this is why the PAC is called "Free At Last":

0 comment(s): (ANONYMOUS ok -but mind our rules, please)                                      << HOME

Wednesday, October 19, 2016

Women, Now I'm Talking To YOU

And so is Barbara Ehrenreich.

And so is this feminist. And this one. And the two we quoted in yesterday's post here.

And I'm guessing none of these women are Hillary-supporters either:

And I wouldn't vote for Hillary if my very life depended on it. I'm educated. I'm literate. I care about the poor, the homeless, the disadvantaged, the refugees trying to escape religious persecution (click on the images links) the world over. I gave over $1,000 last year to help the poor. How much did you give?

I am not a racist, a bigot, an illiterate, an unwashed good-for-nothing. I hate women-abusers, of all kinds, starting with the Abuser-In-Chief, Bill Clinton, and if you don't hate him too, and his wife for trying to smear his victims and discredit their truths, then you have no business hating Trump for similar or even the same criminal and immoral acts. You must hate them all, or none at all. Otherwise, it is you who are the hypocrites, the two-faced, and everyone who has half-a-brain will realize it.

As a Catholic, I know I'm not supposed to "hate" the person, just hate what they did. But if there ever was an "irredeemable," isn't it Bill Clinton? Look at that composite photo above, again. Think of the eight lives, the eight happinesses, he ruined.

What if your face was up there? What if he'd done it to you?

Why should any man be allowed to get away with that?

Then think of how Hillary protected him, and enabled him to keep doing all that irreparable harm to women, multiple women, women just like you and me.

Then ask yourselves this question:

"Would you rather have a great airline pilot who is a jackass or a terrible pilot who is the nicest person in the world?"
Because if you loved what Bill Clinton the President did for this country, he was, and remains, the biggest jackass of them all. Bigger than Trump is.

Women, think very hard about this faux feminism. I ask you, once and for all, to stand up, really, for all of us to be free from victimization by the likes of Bill and Hillary Clinton. Don't give them carte blanche to do as they please, which is what you will do if you elect her. Don't give it to Trump either, but electing him won't give him free rein. On the contrary, he will have more checks and balances and elite opposition than any other President in recent history. Hillary and Bill have gotten away with far too much and when they are done, you will no longer recognize the country we are blessed to have now.

It isn't a choice between another male President and the first woman President.

It isn't a choice between two decent candidates. (Neither are)

It's a choice between

  1. rewarding some powerful men who grope, abuse, and rape women by force--and rewarding their wives who degrade, demean, threaten and destroy those very same victims as the means of protecting their own political and financial futures
  2. and not rewarding them.
I don't want to allow any of them to be rewarded for doing that to women. If Trump abused or forced himself on any woman, never mind bunches of them, then maybe I will just stay home, not vote, and write this country off as doomed.

But if you choose the first choice--voting for Hillary--you cannot call yourself a feminist, or supportive of women. It has to be ALL women, everywhere, even in Saudi Arabia, one of Hillary's hugest Foundation donors, or your "feminism" means absolutely nothing.

0 comment(s): (ANONYMOUS ok -but mind our rules, please)                                      << HOME

Conservatives, I'm Talking To YOU

Or rather, Victor Davis Hanson is, in this National Review article:
Wondering whether some of our Asian allies might someday build nuclear weapons galvanized Japan and South Korea to step up and warn North Korea against further aggressive acts, in a new fashion. In Europe, Trump is said to be unpredictable and volatile. But since when are predictability and serenity always advantages in global poker?
Do our elites ever enter their offices to find their opinion-journalism jobs outsourced at half the cost to writers in India? Are congressional staffers told to move to Alabama, where it is cheaper to telecommunicate their business? Trump’s outrageousness was not really new; it was more a 360-degree mirror of an already outrageous politics as usual.
Would it have been worth it for John McCain to go after Obama’s personal mentor and pastor, the racist, anti-American, and anti-Semitic Reverend Jeremiah Wright, in 2008, to preempt an agenda that led to the passage of the Affordable Care Act? Or, in the second presidential debate of 2012, should Romney have, in Reaganesque fashion, grabbed the hijacked mic back from the moderator and “fact-checker” Candy Crowley, if that dramatic act might have meant his election would have warded off the looming Iran deal? Was losing nobly in 2008 and 2012 preferable to winning ugly with Lee Atwater in 1988?
As voters, we can only compare the respective Clinton and Trump published agendas on illegal immigration, taxes, regulation, defense spending, the Affordable Care Act, abortion, and other social issues to conclude that Trump’s platform is the far more conservative — and a rebuke of the last eight years.
0 comment(s): (ANONYMOUS ok -but mind our rules, please)                                      << HOME

David Gelernter, Someone Yale Probably Wishes They Could Fire

"Trump and the Emasculated Voter:
There’s only one way to protect the nation from Hillary Clinton, and that is to vote for Donald Trump."
You should read David Gelernter's whole article. He's earned that, from all of us.

I’ll vote for Mr. Trump—grimly. But there is no alternative, no shadow of a responsible alternative.

Mr. Trump’s candidacy is a message from the voters. He is the empty gin bottle they have chosen to toss through the window. The message begins with the fact that voters hear what the leaders and pundits don’t: the profound contempt for America and Americans that Mrs. Clinton and President Obama share and their frightening lack of emotional connection to this nation and its people.
Trump voters have noticed that, not just over Mr. Obama’s term but in recent decades, their own opinions have grown increasingly irrelevant. It’s something you feel, like encroaching numbness. Since when has the American public endorsed affirmative action? Yet it’s a major factor in the lives of every student and many workers. Since when did we decide that men and women are interchangeable in hand-to-hand combat on the front lines? Why do we insist on women in combat but not in the NFL? Because we take football seriously. That’s no joke; it’s the sad truth.
What is our nation and what will it be? Will America go on being America or turn into something else? That depends on who lives here—especially given our schools, which no longer condescend to teach Americanism...The liberal theory is that, other things being equal, all human beings have an equal right to settle in America...But it is also too ludicrous to defend. Does all mankind have a right to camp in your backyard, eat in your kitchen, work at your office and borrow your best jogging outfit? We fail in our duty if we don’t think carefully whom we want in this country, who would be best for America.
Hold on, some of my fellow conservatives say. Never mind Hillary. Trump would be dangerous. He would further endanger our national security and world position. He might start unnecessary wars. He might even push the nuclear button. These are important objections, but after thinking them through I’m unable to take them seriously, either in political terms or psychological ones...Ordinary politics says that Mr. Trump will not do crazy things or go off half-cocked, because Republicans in Congress will be eager to impeach him and put Mike Pence in charge. That was the subtext of the vice-presidential debate, though Mr. Pence himself (probably) didn’t intend it. When it’s my turn, you can all relax. Democrats, obviously, will be eager to help when the task is removing a Republican...Impeachment is Trump-voters’ ace in the hole. It’s an abnormal measure, but this is an abnormal year...But Mr. Trump...will be impeachment bait. So will Mrs. Clinton. Even some Democrats have had enough.

Nothing can stop Mr. Trump from shooting off his mouth, but that’s all right. I want America’s enemies off-balance and guessing. For eight years it’s been Humiliate America season—buzz our ships, capture and embarrass our men, murder an American ambassador—a resoundingly successful attempt to spit in our faces and tell each one of us to drop dead. Thanks, Mr. President. Enough is enough. You know that Hillary is Obama Part III. We can’t let that happen. Parts I and II have brought us close enough to catastrophe.

That is the problem for those whose integrity or nobility won’t allow them to vote for Mr. Trump despite their dislike of Mrs. Clinton. There is only one way to take part in protecting this nation from Hillary Clinton, and that is to vote for Donald Trump. A vote for anyone else or for no one might be an honest, admirable gesture in principle, but we don’t need conscientious objectors in this war for the country’s international standing and hence for the safety of the world and the American way of life. It’s too bad one has to vote for Mr. Trump. It will be an unhappy moment at best. Some people will feel dirty, or pained, or outright disgraced.

But when all is said and done, it’s no big deal of a sacrifice for your country. I can think of bigger ones.

0 comment(s): (ANONYMOUS ok -but mind our rules, please)                                      << HOME

The Media IS In The Tank for Hillary and The Democrats

This even made it to Yahoo News.

Friends of mine are as disgusted as I am, but they dismiss the parallels between Bill Clinton's sexual licentiousness and Trump's as irrelevant. They are anything but, because when the mainstream media slams all five fingers down on the scales to weight it in favor of either political party, as they've done since Bill Clinton was abusing women as Governor of Arkansas, then you have the beginnings of the end of our democracy and our country as we know it. Period. End of story. Kiss your freedoms goodbye, once the media controls and selectively edits out parts of the truth they don't want you to be educated about.

Broaddrick has long claimed that the interview that NBC aired edited out her claim that Hillary Clinton was involved in quashing Broaddrick’s rape claims.

“NBC has the full tape of the original Lisa Myers interview,” Isikoff said during an online discussion on “NBC ought to check its archive and run the full interview. (AS long as they’re now culling their archives!)”

The network previously ran the tape but edited out material that was damaging to Hillary. This conspiracy has some history to it.

“Folks have made much of the fact that her claim about the conversation she had with Hillary wasn’t in the interview that run,” Isikoff said. “Broaddrick said it got cut out; Lisa Myers has since agreed Broaddrick said this then—and NBC chose to cut it out.”

NBC has never released an unedited version of its interview with Broaddrick.

Both NBC and the Washington Post “closely vetted” Broaddrick’s claims at the time and chose to run with stories on her claims, Isikoff said.

If we believe that the cover-up is always worse than the crime (which has been media gospel since Watergate, regarded as the high point of American journalism by most journalists themselves), then Hillary’s suspected intimidation of a woman raped by her husband in order to keep her silent surely outweighs any of the accusations of boorishness lobbed at Donald Trump.

This time, there is tape. Tape is what made the difference in focusing public attention on Trump's alleged misbehavior.

Maybe it is time for the torches and pitchforks to start parading in front of 30 Rock.

0 comment(s): (ANONYMOUS ok -but mind our rules, please)                                      << HOME

Some Women Who've Been Sexually Abused, Still Won't Vote For Hillary

Charmaine Yoest:
...I will not vote for [Clinton]. I am not with her. Because I feel betrayed by her.

When news broke that President Bill Clinton had indulged in an “inappropriate relationship” with Monica Lewinsky in the Oval Office, I was stunned.

As Lewinsky’s story unfolded, I felt a slight solidarity: I served both as an intern, and later full-time in the Reagan White House. Similarly in the Clinton White House, Lewinsky began as an intern, before taking a full-time position.

However, what happened next for Lewinsky has been whitewashed in our collective national consciousness. And Hillary is the one who wielded the brush. Many young people have only the vaguest idea who Monica is, and then only because Beyonce turned her name into a verb in her song, “Partition.” This “Beyonce-ification” of the Lewinsky scandal obscures Bill Clinton’s terrible abuse of power, and Hillary’s role in rescuing her husband and rationalizing his abusive behavior.

And D.C McAllister:
I’m A Sexual Assault Victim Who Still Supports Trump

Do I deserve to be called indecent or a coward because I support Donald Trump? Is it right for others to double my shame by using my pain for their own political purposes?
I don’t know whether their stories are true. If he’s guilty and found to be so in a court of law, then I hope he’s punished. I do wonder, however, why his accusers never mentioned these things when NBC hired Trump to be on national television. I wonder why they never mentioned it when he stepped into politics years ago. I wonder why they never mentioned it during the primaries. I wonder why they never mentioned it until October, just before the election.

Was it just because they felt some freedom to do so because of the “Access Hollywood” tape? Maybe, but the timing still seems odd to me. It all seems so—how shall I put it—choreographed.
But Michelle Obama is being dishonest and disingenuous. She supports a woman who has viciously attacked women who say they were the victims of her husband’s sexual deviancy. They are no different than the women coming forward now, except their stories have stood the test of time, and have been corroborated. Yet they get no sympathy from Michelle and Hillary, only scorn and ridicule.

Worse, Michelle proves her disingenuousness by having supported a man who was not only sexually immoral but played a part in a woman’s death. In 1969, U.S. [Democrat] Senator Ted Kennedy left a party late one evening with 28-year-old Mary Jo Kopechne. Kennedy drove the car instead of his chauffeur so he could be alone with the young woman. As he was driving down the dark road, he made a wrong turn and drove the car off a bridge into the tide-swept water below.

Kennedy made it out and swam to shore. Kopechne didn’t. He never called the police that night, and instead slinked back to his hotel room. The young woman died of suffocation when the air-pocket she was in ran out of oxygen. If he had done what was right, she might be alive today.

Despite this history, Michelle and her husband embraced the senator, benefitting from his political support. She never felt any personal grief over Mary Jo Kopechne. She never shuddered when Kennedy put his arm around her as they celebrated political victories together.

The same is true for the alleged victims of Bill Clinton. Michelle apparently never felt shaken by what happened to Juanita Broaddrick, who testified that Clinton attacked her, biting her lip to keep her quiet, then pushing her onto a bed and raping her. Michelle has expressed no empathy for her, even though there were witnesses to Broaddrick’s injuries.

Michelle never claims to have trembled for Paula Jones, who said Clinton pulled her “over like he has done this a million times and grabs me and pulls me over to him to the windowsill and tries to kiss me.” He then dropped his pants.

Then he started — he pulled me over to him while he was leaning up against the wingback chair and he took his hands and was running them up my culottes. And they were long. They were down to my knees. They were long, dressy culottes. And he had his hand up, going up to my middle pelvic area, and he was kissing me on the neck, you know, and trying to kiss me on the lips and I wouldn’t let him. And then I backed back. I said, ‘Stop it. You know, I’m not this kind of girl.’

Where is Michelle’s outrage for Jones? Why does she support the Clintons, who have maligned this woman for years? Does she tremble at the thought of it? Has it shaken her to her core?

Where is Michelle’s disgust for her husband’s indecent exposure—a criminal act? Unlike Trump, he’s caught on tape actually committing the crime! Despite the giggles of the women on the plane, is this not a sexual violation? At the very least it’s a sexual perversion.

0 comment(s): (ANONYMOUS ok -but mind our rules, please)                                      << HOME

"Detroit! There's No White Folks Running Detroit!"

0 comment(s): (ANONYMOUS ok -but mind our rules, please)                                      << HOME

Tuesday, October 18, 2016

ESPN Host: Black People Should Vote Republican One Presidential Election

0 comment(s): (ANONYMOUS ok -but mind our rules, please)                                      << HOME

Traducir todo esto en español, o cualquier otro idioma, copiar las palabras, y luego ir aquí y pegarlo en el cuadro en el lado izquierdo de la página, a continuación, haga clic en el idioma que desee en el lado derecho de la página y haga clic en el derecha botón azul para traducir.

NOTICES (Freedoms of Religion/Speech/Press, Copyrights, Fair Use) at bottom

NATIONAL REVIEW Online's The Corner ~ Kathryn Jean Lopez links to Ap blog, 1/22/07

Associated Press/San Francisco Chronicle: Banno On Boxer and the Illegal Abortion Deaths Urban Legend

San Diego Union Tribune: more Boxer Urban-Legend-Debunk coverage

Ellen Goodman retraction impetus: Aa blog initiates The Straight Dope coverage...and is listed in National Review Senior Editor Ramesh Ponnuru's book The Party of Death, p. 255, Chap. 3 Endnote #11,   4/2006

NY Daily News: "Atheist's Site Is All The Rave

"After Abortion, by Emily Peterson and Annie Banno, two women who had abortions in the 1970s, ...tries to avoid the political tug-of-war that tends to come with this turf. They concentrate instead on discussing the troubling personal effects of abortion on the mothers." ~ Eric Scheske, Godspy contributing editor, in NC Register's "Signs of Life in the Blogosphere", 2/2006

"Godbloggers could, in the best of worlds, become the new apologists...[including] laymen with day jobs: Emily Peterson and Annie Banno, for instance, at the blog After Abortion..."~ Jonathan V. Last, The Weekly Standard online editor, in First Things's "God on the Internet", 12/2005

Amy Welborn, at BeliefNet, links to AfterAbortion blog's Crime & Abortion Series

Catholic News Service: Silent counterprotest at the March For Choice

COMMENTING   Also see Harris Protocol. Correspondence is bloggable unless requested otherwise.
E-mail                Joy

Who We Are        Hiatus Interruptus
NOTICES (Freedoms of Religion/Speech/Press, Copyrights, Fair Use) at bottom

4,800 confidential groups helping now.

We are too. Here are folks who can help:

Feeling Really Bad?: Call
1-800-SUICIDE (784-2433)
& a friend, right now.

Suicide Hope Lines: U.S.A. (by state) or call 1-800-Suicide (784-2433)

Suicide Help - Canada: "If you can't find a crisis centre near you, any of the 24-hour tollfree numbers in your province will be able to help."

UK, ROI: 08457 90 90 90 ,

Suicide Helplines in over 40 other countries

George & Linda Zallie, Stacy's parents, "assisting women who made the difficult choice of ending their pregnancy in finding nonjudgmental help" for suicidal feelings.

For immediate help, call tollfree, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week: national, confidential, post-abortion-recovery hotlines:
1-877-HOPE-4-ME or
1-866-482-5433 or

...more help below...

"I would now like to say a special word to women who have had an abortion...[many are] aware of the many factors which may have influenced your decision, and [do] not doubt that it was a painful and even shattering decision. The wound in your heart may not yet have healed. Certainly what happened was and remains terribly wrong. But do not give in to discouragement and do not lose hope. Try rather to understand what happened and face it honestly. If you have not already done so, give yourselves over with humility and trust to repentance. The Father of mercies is ready to give you his forgiveness and his peace...You will come to understand that nothing is definitively lost and you will also be able to ask forgiveness from your child..."

Hope after Abortion
Ideas for Healing
Rachel's Vineyard Retreats
(non-Christians, even non-religious do attend; they also have interdenominational retreats designed expressly for people of any religion or no religion)
Abortion Recovery
"Entering Canaan" - a ministry of reverence for women and men who suffer following an abortion
Lumina - Hope & Healing After Abortion
Option Line
Books that help
(includes non-religious Post Abortion recovery books)
In Our Midst
For MEN - Resources List
     ** UPDATED 2015 **

Message boards, chat rooms &
   e-groups ** UPDATED 2015 **

Regional & local resources
         ** UPDATED 2015 **

Silent No More Awareness Campaign
After Abortion
Welcome! Our sidebar continues at great length, just below the "MORE HILLARY BACKPEDALS" section, with many links to helpful, respect-life folks of all shapes, sizes, minds & creeds, science, research, stories & just.plain.stuff. Just text-search or browse. But grab a cup of Joe first.

FULL-SEARCH AbortionPundit:

Powered by


Why NOT Hillary?

  1. Abortion Rhetoric Backpedal
  2. Chicago Tribune: "Our hero: Hillary Clinton, the last truth bender"
  3. Rapper Timbaland's $800K and "Ho's" lyrics
  4. Criminal "fugitive", media-ignored Hsu
  5. $5K per Kid
  6. Criminal Berger
  7. "I remember landing under sniper fire...we just ran with our heads down."...
  8. ...and other false claims on her Foreign Policy "chops"

The sidebar continues...

(Below, 320-Links Sidebar Reorg In Progress: Thank You For Your Patience)



Obama On Abortion: A Summary 1990-2009

1) Obama Is 2nd-Highest-Paid Politician by Fannie Mae, Taking $126,346 in only 4 years as Senator; Now Derides GOP/Bush for Allowing Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac To Do Business, When It Was Democrat Presidents Bill Clinton & Jimmy Carter Who Passed The Law Requiring Fannie & Freddie To Give Out Bad Subprime Loans To Those Who Couldn't Afford Them, Which Caused The Entire Financial Meltdown … 2) Jim Johnson (Obama VEEP vetter and former Fannie Mae executive who made millions there) Backpedal … 3) Obama's hiring, connection, support of ACORN, which supported that very law and whose staff have been involved in voter fraud … 4) Rezko's Favor A "Boneheaded" Mistake … 5) Jeremiah Wright Backpedal … 6) Fr. Michael Fleger Backpedal … 7) NAFTA Backpedal … 8) Campaign Financing Backpedal … 9) Mr. "Negotiates-With-Terrorist-States" … 10) Bittergate … 11) Hamas' Chief Political Adviser Hopes BO Will Win Election … 12) Banning Handguns Backpedal … 13) Who Exactly Are "The Rich" He's Going to Sock it to? … 14) Flag Pin Backpedal … 15) Once Open to School Vouchers That Work, Now Deadset Against … 16) Now OK with residual force in Iraq...up to 50,000 troops. … 17) First voted against a law protecting babies who survive an abortion procedure, then lied saying he didn't, then finally forced to admit that he did vote to deny such born babies protection. 18) … "For the first time in my adult lifetime, I am really proud of my country." ~ MO

Region-specific blogs of note: Washington, Midwest, California, Connecticut, Canada (adding as we get the time)


Atom Site Feed

Powered by Blogger

FREEDOM OF RELIGION, FREEDOM OF SPEECH, FREEDOM OF THE PRESS NOTICES: From its inception in 2005 forward, the postings on this site are the co-bloggers' own personal opinions, observations and research, do not reflect or represent the views of any employer(s), past, present or future, nor do/will they relate in any manner to said employer(s) or their businesses at any point in time. The writings expressed herein are protected expression by virtue of the First Amendment of the United States of America and by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, in particular Articles 18 and 19, signed by the U.S.A. in 1948:

1) The First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

"The Free Exercise Clause reserves the right of American citizens to accept any religious belief and engage in religious rituals. The wording in the free-exercise clauses of state constitutions that religious “[o]pinion, expression of opinion, and practice were all expressly protected” by the Free Exercise Clause.[1] The clause protects not just religious beliefs but actions made on behalf of those beliefs. More importantly, the wording of state constitutions suggest that “free exercise envisions religiously compelled exemptions from at least some generally applicable laws.”[2] The Free Exercise Clause not only protects religious belief and expression; it also seems to allow for violation of laws, as long as that violation is made for religious reasons."

2) Article 18 of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, signed by the U.S.A. in 1948, states: "Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance."

3) Article 19 of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights: "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers."

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of the physical, emotional, social and spiritual negative effects of abortion on women, men and families, and to provide resources for help and information to anyone experiencing these effects or trying to help those who are. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. This material is distributed without profit.

"COPYRIGHT NOTICE: This weblog is Copyright © 2005 - 2016 - Annie Banno - All Rights Reserved. "Skews" Reporting ™ is a trademark of Annie Banno Copyright © 2004 - 2016. All Rights Reserved. All original content by the weblog author(s) is protected by copyright(s). This includes writings, artwork, photographs, and other forms of authorship protected by current U.S. Copyright Law, especially as described in Sections 102(a) and 103. PERMISSION GRANTED FOR UNLIMITED BUT NON-COMMERCIAL AND ONLY RESPECTING-ALL-HUMAN-LIFE USE. CREDIT REQUIRED. No rights in any copyrighted material, whether exclusive or non-exclusive, may be transferred in the absence of a written agreement that is the product of the parties' negotiations, fully approved by independent counsel retained by the author(s) and formally executed with manual signatures by all parties to the agreement pursuant to the statutory requirements of Section 204(a) of current U.S. Copyright Law, Federal Copyright Act of 1976, appendices and provisions."

Since 6/13/2005