3,400 confidential and totally free groups to call and go to in the U.S...1,400 outside the U.S. . . . 98 of these in Canada.
Free, financial help given to women and families in need.More help given to women, families.
Helping with mortgage payments and more.More help.
The $1,950 need has been met!CPCs help women with groceries, clothing, cribs, "safe haven" places.
Help for those whose babies haveDown Syndrome and Other Birth Defects.
CALL 1-888-510-BABY or click on the picture on the left, if you gave birth or are about to and can't care for your baby, to give your baby to a worker at a nearby hospital (some states also include police stations or fire stations), NO QUESTIONS ASKED. YOU WON'T GET IN ANY TROUBLE or even have to tell your name; Safehaven people will help the baby be adopted and cared for.

Sunday, November 18, 2007

I watched this interview live today on TV:
"It's the logic of the Civil War," Huckabee said Sunday, comparing abortion rights to slavery. "If morality is the point here, and if it's right or wrong, not just a political question, then you can't have 50 different versions of what's right and what's wrong."
It makes perfect sense to me.

If it doesn't to some folks, then they ought to be quite content with allowing all 50 states to go back and decide whether or not slavery is acceptable again.

The language of the Supreme Court in both cases was exactly the same and had the same effect: to de-personize a human person:
Scott v. Sandford--the 1857 Dred Scott decision--used the phrases "non-person" and "the property of his master" to refer to Mr. Scott. Both Roe v. Wade (410 U.S. 113[1973]) and Doe v. Bolton (410 U.S. 179[1973]) used the phrases "non-person" and "the property of the mother" to refer to the unborn child.
I too am a bit stumped by the National Right To Life Coalition's endorsement of Fred Thompson. Haven't researched it enough yet, but the man (FT) has done way too much to muddle his message. He's done nothing but deflate whatever confidence I and many others might have had in him. He looks, sounds and seems uninformed, too "dancy" around some subjects. I'm not even certain one can say he has the best pro-life stance if he once lobbied for a pro-choice organization, as is well known now. Still researching, still determining...

If one has any doubts about Huckabee, really, the best thing to do is get a YouTube or whatever of his interview today on Fox. Listen to the whole thing. Otherwise you just. aren't. getting. the. complete. answers. Club For Growth, SCHMub for SCHMowth. Huckabee really did a more than able job at answering his critics on every count, without getting defensive (think Hillary) and without tripping over any of his answers and sounding clueless or out of touch (think Fred).

Another stupendous piece of sleuthing about what's really what was published last month here.

I need to research further Huckabee's idea of this so-called Fair Tax in more depth, to be sure which of the "they said, he said's" is in fact truth. If Huckabee isn't spinning the facts, he may have some pretty damn good points. My first rubber-on-the-road thought though is, it won't happen because the vast industry that is the C.P.A. industry won't be put out of lifelong and valuable jobs that easily, nor should they be. I happen to think my accountant is great. I'd feel very sorry for him if he suddenly had no career. Never mind how much howling, scratching and clawing we'd withstand from the IRS itself, who would all also be out of their jobs.

There. Maybe, just maybe, I've just proved wrong those pro-choice folk who think we're narrow-minded, blinders-on, one-issue-only people on this side of Roe v.Wade.

One can dream, at least.

And Thompson can cluck all he wants about the upcoming Huckabee-Chuck Norris campaign ad, but I saw the clip on Fox TV and I roared. Here's the URL, or you can just click play below:

I don't think it says Huckabee is a goofball about immigration (FT's claim). I think it says he's got a sense of humor and a humanness about him. It's a brilliant ad. It isn't meant to be taken as serious public policy. It's light, so FT ought to lighten up. He's just a little miffed he didn't think of it first, perhaps.

On a serious note, while at first I was a bit unsettled by Huckabee's support for in-state tuition rates for US-born children of illegal immigrants, I had to stop, take a step back, and think. Isn't that what Catholics, and for that matter all Christians, should support? These children didn't break any laws. They are US-born. What would Jesus do with our illegal immigrants, indeed.

For the record, I do not support deportation of the many good people trying to survive by coming here illegally. I do support securing the borders, sea-to-shining-sea fence and all, so we can stop the system-breaking surge and simultaneously make stick the process of getting legal status.

I do support, not amnesty, but some means of addressing a lengthy course of legalizing action and appropriate price-to-be-paid for achieving eventual legal status. I think some form of fine is appropriate, after all, they are not abiding by the law. But they also are not wholly to blame. The Corporate Americans--both on the job and at their plush private homes--wanted to shave costs to put those extra profits in their fat pockets, so they began, years ago, hiring a few illegals. Word got around, more illegals came, and soon the wages for those jobs were driven down so far that, naturally, "Americans don't want those jobs." Sound familiar? Of course, legal Americans don't want the dirt-paying jobs, but those jobs didn't used to pay mere dirt.

Same garbage with Chinese-made goods, for which we're now paying pipers left and right. Corporate America had to wring more and more profits out to pay themselves and keep inflating their stock prices. Solution? Pay dirt-cheap prices to China to make the goods, where there are miniscule-to-nonexistent safety/quality guarantees, keep the extra dough for the executives and owners, let the children lick lead paint off their toys, the dogs die and the American worker go without a lifelong job.

It's why I boycott Chinese-made goods every chance I get and have done so for years.

Getting back to Huckabee's in-state tuition and "they will know we are Christians by our WHAT?", it struck me: Heck, many, many of my friends and I have helped such women in crisis pregnancies outside the local abortion clinic when they changed their minds wanting to avoid the abortion. My friends and many, many prolife folks nationwide have helped all such women in painful desperate situations like that, even the illegal immigrant ones, get healthcare from the state, places to live, food, clothing, pre and postnatal care, and even jobs.

Who in their right, Christian mind could turn the illegal immigrant woman away when she said she'd changed her mind out there on the sidewalk and now didn't want to abort her baby? After having had an abortion myself in my twenties and eventually coming to abhor and grieve what I'd done, I find myself wholly unable ever to neglect to help even one woman--illegal immigrant or not--who wants to avoid an abortion.

How could I allow myself to be the priest or the Levite who ignores the beaten, desperate person bleeding to death on the side of the road? How could I not try to be the Good Samaritan instead?

What prolifer in their right mind, Christian or otherwise, could honestly allow that unborn baby, that child of an illegal immigrant, to go to its death and that woman to be subject to a life of pain and regret, having wanted her baby but finding no help to keep her child?

One can call Huckabee a kind of hybrid conservative/social liberal, if he agrees that we can't turn our backs on such children.

Maybe you'll have to call me one, then, too.
0 comment(s): (ANONYMOUS ok -but mind our rules, please)                                      << HOME

Traducir todo esto en español, o cualquier otro idioma, copiar las palabras, y luego ir aquí y pegarlo en el cuadro en el lado izquierdo de la página, a continuación, haga clic en el idioma que desee en el lado derecho de la página y haga clic en el derecha botón azul para traducir.

NOTICES (Freedoms of Religion/Speech/Press, Copyrights, Fair Use) at bottom

NATIONAL REVIEW Online's The Corner ~ Kathryn Jean Lopez links to Ap blog, 1/22/07

Associated Press/San Francisco Chronicle: Banno On Boxer and the Illegal Abortion Deaths Urban Legend

San Diego Union Tribune: more Boxer Urban-Legend-Debunk coverage

Ellen Goodman retraction impetus: Aa blog initiates The Straight Dope coverage...and is listed in National Review Senior Editor Ramesh Ponnuru's book The Party of Death, p. 255, Chap. 3 Endnote #11,   4/2006

NY Daily News: "Atheist's Site Is All The Rave

"After Abortion, by Emily Peterson and Annie Banno, two women who had abortions in the 1970s, ...tries to avoid the political tug-of-war that tends to come with this turf. They concentrate instead on discussing the troubling personal effects of abortion on the mothers." ~ Eric Scheske, Godspy contributing editor, in NC Register's "Signs of Life in the Blogosphere", 2/2006

"Godbloggers could, in the best of worlds, become the new apologists...[including] laymen with day jobs: Emily Peterson and Annie Banno, for instance, at the blog After Abortion..."~ Jonathan V. Last, The Weekly Standard online editor, in First Things's "God on the Internet", 12/2005

Amy Welborn, at BeliefNet, links to AfterAbortion blog's Crime & Abortion Series

Catholic News Service: Silent counterprotest at the March For Choice

COMMENTING   Also see Harris Protocol. Correspondence is bloggable unless requested otherwise.
E-mail                Joy

Who We Are        Hiatus Interruptus
NOTICES (Freedoms of Religion/Speech/Press, Copyrights, Fair Use) at bottom

4,800 confidential groups helping now.

We are too. Here are folks who can help:

Feeling Really Bad?: Call
1-800-SUICIDE (784-2433)
& a friend, right now.

Suicide Hope Lines: U.S.A. (by state) or call 1-800-Suicide (784-2433)

Suicide Help - Canada: "If you can't find a crisis centre near you, any of the 24-hour tollfree numbers in your province will be able to help."

UK, ROI: 08457 90 90 90 ,

Suicide Helplines in over 40 other countries

George & Linda Zallie, Stacy's parents, "assisting women who made the difficult choice of ending their pregnancy in finding nonjudgmental help" for suicidal feelings.

For immediate help, call tollfree, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week: national, confidential, post-abortion-recovery hotlines:
1-877-HOPE-4-ME or
1-866-482-5433 or

...more help below...

"I would now like to say a special word to women who have had an abortion...[many are] aware of the many factors which may have influenced your decision, and [do] not doubt that it was a painful and even shattering decision. The wound in your heart may not yet have healed. Certainly what happened was and remains terribly wrong. But do not give in to discouragement and do not lose hope. Try rather to understand what happened and face it honestly. If you have not already done so, give yourselves over with humility and trust to repentance. The Father of mercies is ready to give you his forgiveness and his peace...You will come to understand that nothing is definitively lost and you will also be able to ask forgiveness from your child..."

Hope after Abortion
Ideas for Healing
Rachel's Vineyard Retreats
(non-Christians, even non-religious do attend; they also have interdenominational retreats designed expressly for people of any religion or no religion)
Abortion Recovery
"Entering Canaan" - a ministry of reverence for women and men who suffer following an abortion
Lumina - Hope & Healing After Abortion
Option Line
Books that help
(includes non-religious Post Abortion recovery books)
In Our Midst
For MEN - Resources List
     ** UPDATED 2015 **

Message boards, chat rooms &
   e-groups ** UPDATED 2015 **

Regional & local resources
         ** UPDATED 2015 **

Silent No More Awareness Campaign
After Abortion
Welcome! Our sidebar continues at great length, just below the "MORE HILLARY BACKPEDALS" section, with many links to helpful, respect-life folks of all shapes, sizes, minds & creeds, science, research, stories & just.plain.stuff. Just text-search or browse. But grab a cup of Joe first.

FULL-SEARCH AbortionPundit:

Powered by


"Do As We Say, Republicans, Not As We Do" - All 8 Parts

Why NOT Hillary?

  1. Abortion Rhetoric Backpedal
  2. Chicago Tribune: "Our hero: Hillary Clinton, the last truth bender"
  3. Rapper Timbaland's $800K and "Ho's" lyrics
  4. Criminal "fugitive", media-ignored Hsu
  5. $5K per Kid
  6. Criminal Berger
  7. "I remember landing under sniper fire...we just ran with our heads down."...
  8. ...and other false claims on her Foreign Policy "chops"

The sidebar continues...

(Below, 320-Links Sidebar Reorg In Progress: Thank You For Your Patience)



Obama On Abortion: A Summary 1990-2009

1) Obama Is 2nd-Highest-Paid Politician by Fannie Mae, Taking $126,346 in only 4 years as Senator; Now Derides GOP/Bush for Allowing Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac To Do Business, When It Was Democrat Presidents Bill Clinton & Jimmy Carter Who Passed The Law Requiring Fannie & Freddie To Give Out Bad Subprime Loans To Those Who Couldn't Afford Them, Which Caused The Entire Financial Meltdown … 2) Jim Johnson (Obama VEEP vetter and former Fannie Mae executive who made millions there) Backpedal … 3) Obama's hiring, connection, support of ACORN, which supported that very law and whose staff have been involved in voter fraud … 4) Rezko's Favor A "Boneheaded" Mistake … 5) Jeremiah Wright Backpedal … 6) Fr. Michael Fleger Backpedal … 7) NAFTA Backpedal … 8) Campaign Financing Backpedal … 9) Mr. "Negotiates-With-Terrorist-States" … 10) Bittergate … 11) Hamas' Chief Political Adviser Hopes BO Will Win Election … 12) Banning Handguns Backpedal … 13) Who Exactly Are "The Rich" He's Going to Sock it to? … 14) Flag Pin Backpedal … 15) Once Open to School Vouchers That Work, Now Deadset Against … 16) Now OK with residual force in Iraq...up to 50,000 troops. … 17) First voted against a law protecting babies who survive an abortion procedure, then lied saying he didn't, then finally forced to admit that he did vote to deny such born babies protection. 18) … "For the first time in my adult lifetime, I am really proud of my country." ~ MO

Region-specific blogs of note: Washington, Midwest, California, Connecticut, Canada (adding as we get the time)


Atom Site Feed

Powered by Blogger

FREEDOM OF RELIGION, FREEDOM OF SPEECH, FREEDOM OF THE PRESS NOTICES: From its inception in 2005 forward, the postings on this site are the co-bloggers' own personal opinions, observations and research, do not reflect or represent the views of any employer(s), past, present or future, nor do/will they relate in any manner to said employer(s) or their businesses at any point in time. The writings expressed herein are protected expression by virtue of the First Amendment of the United States of America and by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, in particular Articles 18 and 19, signed by the U.S.A. in 1948:

1) The First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

"The Free Exercise Clause reserves the right of American citizens to accept any religious belief and engage in religious rituals. The wording in the free-exercise clauses of state constitutions that religious “[o]pinion, expression of opinion, and practice were all expressly protected” by the Free Exercise Clause.[1] The clause protects not just religious beliefs but actions made on behalf of those beliefs. More importantly, the wording of state constitutions suggest that “free exercise envisions religiously compelled exemptions from at least some generally applicable laws.”[2] The Free Exercise Clause not only protects religious belief and expression; it also seems to allow for violation of laws, as long as that violation is made for religious reasons."

2) Article 18 of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, signed by the U.S.A. in 1948, states: "Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance."

3) Article 19 of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights: "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers."

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of the physical, emotional, social and spiritual negative effects of abortion on women, men and families, and to provide resources for help and information to anyone experiencing these effects or trying to help those who are. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. This material is distributed without profit.

"COPYRIGHT NOTICE: This weblog is Copyright © 2005 - 2021 - Annie Banno - All Rights Reserved. "Skews" Reporting ™ is a trademark of Annie Banno Copyright © 2004 - 2021. All Rights Reserved. All original content by the weblog author(s) is protected by copyright(s). This includes writings, artwork, photographs, and other forms of authorship protected by current U.S. Copyright Law, especially as described in Sections 102(a) and 103. PERMISSION GRANTED FOR UNLIMITED BUT NON-COMMERCIAL AND ONLY RESPECTING-ALL-HUMAN-LIFE USE. CREDIT REQUIRED. No rights in any copyrighted material, whether exclusive or non-exclusive, may be transferred in the absence of a written agreement that is the product of the parties' negotiations, fully approved by independent counsel retained by the author(s) and formally executed with manual signatures by all parties to the agreement pursuant to the statutory requirements of Section 204(a) of current U.S. Copyright Law, Federal Copyright Act of 1976, appendices and provisions."

Since 6/13/2005