CALL 1-888-510-BABY or click on the picture on the left, if you gave birth or are about to and can't care for your baby, to give your baby to a worker at a nearby hospital (some states also include police stations or fire stations), NO QUESTIONS ASKED. YOU WON'T GET IN ANY TROUBLE or even have to tell your name; Safehaven people will help the baby be adopted and cared for.
"Trump wasn’t commenting on what the Supreme Court has held; nor was he remarking on the frequency of late-term abortions, or the scope of abortion restrictions across the United States. He was commenting solely on Hillary Clinton’s position on abortion. The fact-checkers are checking “facts” that were never even addressed at the debate.
"Perhaps the most viciously mendacious quibble came from Dr. Jennifer Gunter, an OB/GYN who, writing at the Huffington Post, claimed late-term abortions are generally undertaken to kill a baby who has birth defects. As she put it, 'There are no ninth month abortions. Really. A ninth month abortion is a unicorn and so it’s ridiculous to even discuss it.'
"How does Gunter characterize this 'unicorn?' Simply put: '[T]erminations for birth defects isn’t ripping "the baby out of the womb in the ninth month." At 38 or 39 weeks, it’s always an induction and is simply called a delivery.' Got that? Killing an unborn human isn’t an 'abortion' if you don’t call it an abortion. Rather, it’s a 'delivery.' That makes it better.
"I have very little faith that Trump, if elected, would do much of anything about abortion. His own ostensible conversion to the pro-life movement feels insincere and opportunistic, like most of the rest of his campaign. But at the very least he spoke accurately about Hillary Clinton’s position on abortion. The least the fact-checkers and the journalist class could do is assess his claim honestly. But why would they start now?"
"Yes, Hillary Clinton is a late-term-abortion radical...
"...go back and read the transcript: What Trump said (in two iterations) was that 'if you go with what Hillary is saying in the ninth month you can take the baby and rip the baby out of the womb of the mother just prior to the birth of the baby.' That is the logic of her position on late-term abortion, which is that an abortionist should be free to perform an abortion at any stage of pregnancy if there is a health reason for it, including a reason of emotional health. Some journalists were touting this criticism of Trump’s comments and defense of Clinton’s position, which ends up saying that abortions at the very end of pregnancy never happen but should still be legal because of the principle of the thing. Trump grasps that logic and says he objects to it. 'Now you can say that that’s okay and Hillary can say that that’s okay, but it’s not okay with me.'”
Who in their right mind is it really ok with?
It's ok with Politico, the Los Angeles Times, Glenn Kessler at the Washington Post, the Huffington Post, the Guttmacher Institute (the "research arm" of Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion provider in the nation), NPR, the New York Times.
Let me ask how smart you all are: do you see the pattern in that last sentence?
What's the common thread in that sentence? Let me repeat the pertinent parts with emphasis this time:
Politico...the Los Angeles Times...the Washington Post...the Huffington Post...NPR...the New York Times...
Do you see the pattern now? Doesn't it make you stop and think: AM I really getting the straight skinny on the truth?
Or are all those news media outlets not telling me the real facts?
Don't you ever wonder? How can so many others so honestly be quoting such facts and such science, and be as wrong as you've thought them to be?
0 comment(s): (ANONYMOUS ok -but mind our rules, please)                                      << HOME
Traducir todo esto en español, o cualquier otro idioma, copiar las palabras, y luego ir aquí y pegarlo en el cuadro en el lado izquierdo de la página, a continuación, haga clic en el idioma que desee en el lado derecho de la página y haga clic en el derecha botón azul para traducir.
NOTICES (Freedoms of Religion/Speech/Press, Copyrights, Fair Use) at bottom
"After Abortion,...run by Emily Peterson and Annie Banno, two women who had abortions in the 1970s, ...tries to avoid the political tug-of-war that tends to come with this turf. They concentrate instead on discussing the troubling personal effects of abortion on the mothers." ~ Eric Scheske, Godspy contributing editor, in NC Register's "Signs of Life in the Blogosphere", 2/2006
"I would now like to say a special word to women who have had an abortion...[many are] aware of the many factors which may have influenced your decision, and [do] not doubt that it was a painful and even shattering decision. The wound in your heart may not yet have healed. Certainly what happened was and remains terribly wrong. But do not give in to discouragement and do not lose hope. Try rather to understand what happened and face it honestly. If you have not already done so, give yourselves over with humility and trust to repentance. The Father of mercies is ready to give you his forgiveness and his peace...You will come to understand that nothing is definitively lost and you will also be able to ask forgiveness from your child..."
Welcome! Our sidebar continues at great length, just below the "MORE HILLARY BACKPEDALS" section, with many links to helpful, respect-life folks of all shapes, sizes, minds & creeds, science, research, stories & just.plain.stuff. Just text-search or browse. But grab a cup of Joe first.