Drip...Drip...Drip
Podesta: "The leakers should shut up."
Yeah, that's it, keep more truth from us, the American public. That's worked so well for Hillary for 30 years, hasn't it? And you don't think you have to worry about your freedom of speech under Hillary?
"Pro-Life? You can still vote for Trump"
"A majority of voters believe Hillary Clinton has done something illegal, according to a new McClatchy-Marist Poll days before the presidential election."A total of 83 percent of likely voters believe that Clinton did something wrong – 51 percent saying she did something illegal and 32 percent saying she something unethical but not illegal. Just 14 percent said she’s done nothing wrong.
By comparison, 79 percent think Donald Trump did something wrong, though not nearly as many think he did something illegal. Just 26 percent think he’s done something illegal, while 53 percent think he’s dome something unethical but not illegal. Just 17 percent think he’s done nothing wrong.
"I want our first woman president to have integrity, and I don’t think she has any." ~ Dawn Foley, 54, from Conyers, Ga.
Joan Locklear, a lifelong Democrat from Pembroke [NC], said gender did not dictate her choice. “The last eight years have been a nightmare, and I’m ready for a change for the sake of my grandchild,” said Locklear."The ‘leftover people’ may deliver a win for Trump."Other female Trump supporters said they welcome the chance to vote for a female for president one day. Just not this female, not this time.
“I’d vote for a woman, but not someone as crooked as [Hillary] is,” said Karen Hobbs of Wilmington [NC].
Half of Omabacare's customers had to cut back on what they could actually get for healthcare services. They couldn't afford to get the healthcare they needed. So much for having "coverage."
More on astronomical premium rates hikes, choices dwindling to one or none, etc. with Obamacare.
Department of Justice colludes wtih Hillary Clinton's campaign about developments in the State Department emails probe.
Worried about what Donald Trump is really guilty of, as in, what he's actually done that's wrong? "Let’s go to the record."
Comey must have been really threatened this time:
"To rehearse Mr. Comey’s actions: In July he publicly exonerates Mrs. Clinton in an extraordinary press event, two weeks before she is to be nominated for President, though that is not his responsibility. He thus liberates Attorney General Loretta Lynch from her decision-making obligations as the nation’s chief prosecuting official. Later we learn Justice cut needless and generous immunity deals with Mrs. Clinton’s advisers.But contrary to what the liberal media tells you, Comey's latest letter isn't exonerating Hillary. Not by a longshot:"Then 11 days before Election Day Mr. Comey sends a letter to Congress saying the FBI has found new email evidence. He comes under ferocious Democratic assault for meddling in the final days of the campaign. His boss, President Obama, joins the criticism and says Mrs. Clinton has already been exonerated. Then two days before the election Mr. Comey sends another letter exonerating Mrs. Clinton again. And Washington’s political class wonders why Americans don’t trust government?
"It’s hard to avoid the conclusion that the main point of Mr. Comey’s many political interventions has always been to protect Mr. Comey’s job and political standing. Certainly Mrs. Clinton will have cause to be grateful to Mr. Comey if she wins on Tuesday. The price to the country is the damage he has done to the reputation of the FBI as an apolitical law-enforcement agency."
There is an ongoing investigation into the Clinton Foundation. (Baier's other scoop in the same package, that the FBI has retained the electronic devices it was thought to have destroyed as part of immunity deals with Clinton, remains unchallenged.)Nate Silver, founder/pollster at FiveThirtyEight.com and not a Trump fan:Other reporters at Fox have reporting that backs up Baier's reporting on the Clinton Foundation investigation. (I have one source who says the same thing). And Baier is hardly alone in reporting that the FBI is investigating the Clinton Foundation. Richard Pollock of The Daily Caller has been reporting the same since the summer. And CNN Senior Law Enforcement Analyst Tom Fuentes, a former top FBI official, cited conversations with "several" senior FBI officials when reported three times last weekend that the FBI investigation of the Clinton Foundation was "ongoing."
"The FBI has an intensive investigation ongoing into the Clinton Foundation," Fuentes said. "The FBI made the determination that the investigation would go forward as a comprehensive unified case and be coordinated. So that investigation is ongoing and Huma Abedin and her role in the foundation and possible allegations concerning the activities of the Secretary of State in the nature of the Foundation and possible pay-to-play, that's still being looked at."
Fuentes said the that the discovery of emails on Anthony Weiner's computer led the FBI to reopen the investigation into Clinton's use of email, which had been closed. "That part's being reopened. The Clinton Foundation case didn't need to be reopened. It's never been closed – that's ongoing."
When anchor Poppy Harlow asked Fuentes whether what he was relating were "facts you know from the FBI," Fuentes responded: "Yes, I do. Senior officials at the FBI, several of them."
"...you have some forecasts that show Clinton with a 98 or 99 percent chance of winning. That doesn't pass a commonsense test, which is we've seen lots of elections where there's about a three-point polling error. In 2012, in fact, Obama beat his polls in many states by about three points. If Clinton were to beat her polls by three points and you see something we call a borderline landslide, but if it goes the other way, and all of a sudden Trump could very easily win the electoral college."
posted by Annie at 10:07 AM
