"War on Women?" Obama White House Pays Its Women Employees Less Than The Men

And the best they can come up with is to jump on "Romney's Binders Full of Women" to "prove" he's anti-women? Any idiot who's ever held or looked for a job in business knows he was referring to binders of R E S U M E S of women applicants. Good Lord, how misled can some people get?

How about listening to the women and women's groups supporting Romney? How about the Lt. Governor, the top policy advisor, and half his cabinet when Massachusetts Governor, all women?

Chalk it up to the dirty minds of those opposing the Republican worldview, to cheapen what Romney said in the most serious, business-like, presidential presentation during that second debate.

For the record, these three women who co-write this blog won't be voting for Obama. Never did, never will.

"The rates of unemployment, second-quarter GDP growth and labor-force participation are all worse than they were three weeks before any modern presidential re-election.

... Gallup reported on Sept. 9 that only 30% of the public is "satisfied" with the condition of the country. The Oct. 13 Washington Post/ABC poll found that 56% think the country is "off on the wrong track."

"[This Board is] the beloved center-piece of Obamacare—An effort to give an unelected and unconstitutional board of bureaucrats sweeping powers to determine whether grandma gets her bypass surgery from Medicare, or a boot off the cliff.

"...the whole point of the [Obamacare Independent Payment Advisory] Board is to use price controls to discourage expensive [medical] treatments. Yes, it is possible that some good doctor will be willing to perform bypass surgeries for Medicare patients even when the board only allows, say, payment for aspirin. It’s also very unlikely. If the board decides to set payment for state-of-the-art dialysis at below cost, reasoning that the benefits of the procedure aren’t commensurate with the added expense, it isn’t rationing care directly. But it is indeed rationing care, because this would effectively consign patients to older treatments.

... "What distinguishes the IPAB from the Environmental Protection Agency or the Federal Drug Administration is that those agencies give affected parties opportunities to weigh in before issuing their rules. This board would not be required to offer any avenue for patients and providers to air their concerns, nor could its decisions be challenged in court. Coaxing coverage out of heartless private insurers will seem like a piece of cake compared to confronting this all-powerful bureaucracy, which allows neither access nor appeal."

Crowley Walks Back Her Defense of Obama on Libya and Says Romney Was Right In the Main

...even though she too still got wrong the exact quote of what Obama said. Funny, how what she said on CNN after the fact didn't sound at all like what she actually said during the debate. No wonder Romney was dumbfounded, with all the lying going on around him by the two other people on the stage with him. It's mind-boggling how people will swear up and down they KNOW what he really said, when they couldn't be more wrong.

Another Green Company Obama Spent YOUR & My Money On, Goes Belly-Up:

"In 2008 President Obama sold voters a fairy tale about millions of "green jobs" that he could conjure up merely by "investing" taxpayer money. The 2012 election is in part a referendum on whether Americans can be fooled again."

How About A President Who Literally Says He's 'Not Too Proud To Beg' For Your Vote?

Or do you think you're starting to feel like these folks who voted for Obama in 2008 and won't be voting for him, even after the second debate?

Especially the woman who shot down the other two women who'd bought the Obama lies that Romney is anti-women.

The second part of that mostly-former-Obama-voters group discussion is here, and the best part is the last guy to talk:

where he points out what most Americans don't know-and I didn't until this week: that the current Obama administration is allowing the Fed to print $40 BILLION in new money into the economy EACH MONTH, which can easily cause hyperinflation and crash everything down around our ears.

Even if it doesn't cause hyperinflation, here's what it will cause:

At the direction of the Fed, the U.S. Treasury will print $40 billion per month that previously never existed to buy mortgages that have no market value. In layperson’s terms, your neighbor, who bought a house he couldn’t afford with little equity down, will be getting a bailout from the Fed. What’s more, because of this mass printing of dollars, inflation will rise, your paycheck will be worth less, and it will cost more to buy groceries and fill up the gas tank.

Inflationary and money-printing policies like [this, called quantitative easing or] QE always hurt the middle class. High inflation also causes uncertainty in the business world, which will lead to more layoffs and higher unemployment.

The inevitable results of QE will damage the earning power of the most productive working-class Americans. When the dollar loses value because of inflation, it’s the equivalent of a tax on those who can least afford it. Wealthy Americans aren’t nearly as susceptible to the pitfalls of high inflation. Many of them can afford to hedge against a less valuable dollar by investing in gold, real estate and other commodities that protect and insulate them. The middle class gets stuck with a smaller paycheck, a higher grocery bill and the threat of lost jobs.

That's another HALF-TRILLION a YEAR, folks. Yeah, sure, we really NEED ANOTHER FOUR YEARS OF THAT, too.

[And if you think you've "got me" by saying, well, the Fed's Bernanke who made that decision was appointed by George W. Bush, read this: Bernanke didn't make this decision till two mere months after "Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), clearly hoping the Fed would give the economy a pre-election boost, exhorted Bernanke: 'The Fed is the only game in town.'" So in Bernanke's first 6 years and 5 months since GWB appointed him, he didn't make this move, but did so only 2 months after Schumer urged him to take on the role that Congress itself should have- "managing economic policy." George Will is right to add: "Good grief."]